Bertrand Russell the mediocre Fabian Society atheist NWO-Puppet Philosopher…

Conspiracy Revelation: 4.1.2020:
Uncomfortable truths become hidden by Facebook (NWO-Central),
but unveiled by Conspiracy Revelation.
Bertrand Russell the mediocre Fabian Society atheist NWO-Puppet Philosopher…

„Truth Talk News
BERTRAND RUSSELL, EUGENICS, SOCIALISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
TRUTH TALK NEWS February 19, 2020
“It is possible that mankind is on the threshold of a golden age; but, if so, it will be necessary first to slay the dragon that guards the door, and this dragon is religion. The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” – Bertrand Russell
Wikipedia calls Bertrand Russell, a “British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, socialist, pacifist and social critic.“
„Like fellow eugenicist, Margaret Sanger, their reputations are praised in history books, classrooms, mass media and political rhetoric. Russell was an old money elitist. He was also a Fabian Socialist eugenicist and social engineer.
In true New World Order fashion, Bertrand Russell claimed to be a meek, compassionate pacifist, but in reality he was an old money Fabian Socialist, racist, Malthusian, eugenicist and social engineer.
Russell descended from an old establishment family. He was a propagandist, whose job it was to propagate certain ideas in the service of the monied elites. He was instrumental in the project to wreck European and American culture through his chairmanship of the CIA sponsored Congress for Cultural Freedom.
Claiming to be a pacifist, Bertrand Russell was a racist Fabian Socialist and promoter of depopulation. He promoted the well known policy of Mutually Assured Destruction and founded The Pugwash movement, which used fear and the spectre of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government.
Along wih H.G. Wells, Margaret Sanger, George Bernard Shaw and others, Bertrand Russell were Multhusian ideologues and one world government promoters. Bertrand Russell was a significant figure in the agenda to bring about the post-WW2 New World Order Agenda.
Social engineering changes, that for fifty years were being dragged by the elite’s Fabian Socialist Turtle, shielded by the Wolves in Sheep’s clothing that adorns their logo. A logo that was created by Fabian Socialist elitist George Bernard Shaw.“
„Considering the current increasing violence and threat to Christians and Jews and for greater understanding of the very dangerous precipice America and the world stand before the following quote from Bertrand Russell should be very illuminating.
Quotes from his works reveal a conflict of duality in thought, both benevolent and despotic.
In 1952, Russell’s revealing and prophetic masterwork, The Impact Of Science On Society was published. The book begins with a very kind, sympathetic and the humanitarian tilt to drawer readers in. But as the pages unfold, the dark underbelly of Russell’s ideological beliefs fester to the surface as evil, totalitarian rot.
„Der dunkle Unterbauch von Russells ideologischen Überzeugungen eitert an der Oberfläche als böse, totalitäre Fäulnis.“
On Pages 40-41 he wrote:
I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology … Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education.’
Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part … It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.
The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship … The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive.
Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten.
Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective.
Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.
Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.
On Pages 49-50 Russell wrote the following alarming and prophetic prediction:
Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy … It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries.
Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished …
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible …
The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia … If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages.
The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilised.
The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method …
Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
On Page 54 Russell continued:
After all, most civilized and semi-civilized countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority.
When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.
Regarding the ongoing 1957 depopulation agenda, on Pages 103-104, Russell wrote:
I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective.
If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists.
The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s. However, I am wandering from the question of stability, to which I must return.
There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority.
All these methods have been practiced: the first, for example, by the Australian aborigines; the second by the Aztecs, the Spartans, and the rulers of Plato’s Republic; the third in the world as some Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia …
Of these three, only birth control avoids extreme cruelty and unhappiness for the majority of human beings. Meanwhile, so long as there is not a single world government there will be competition for power among the different nations.
And as increase of population brings the threat of famine, national power will become more and more obviously the only way of avoiding starvation. There will therefore be blocs in which the hungry nations band together against those that are well fed. That is the explanation of the victory of communism in China.
On Page 105, Russell continued:
The need for a world government, if the population problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on Darwinian principles. (Total NWO Nazi Bullshit Fake Philosophy) A society is not stable unless it is on the whole satisfactory to the holders of power and the holders of power are not exposed to the risk of successful revolution.
On Pages 110-111 Bertrand Russell wrote:
First, as regards physical conditions. Soil and raw materials must not be used up so fast that scientific progress cannot continually make good the loss by means of new inventions and discoveries …
If raw materials are not to be used up too fast, there must not be free competition for their acquisition and use but an international authority to ration them in – such quantities as may from time to time seem compatible with continued industrial prosperity. And similar considerations apply to soil conservation.“
Second, as regards population … To deal with this problem it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority.
This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority.
If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling.
During the period immediately after World War 2, the campaign to create a cold war was fomented. The propaganda phrase, “Cold War” was first coined by CFR New World Order mouthpiece, the infamous Walter Lippman.
The CIA was then organized under the National Security Act of 1947. The United Nations was founded soon after by Soviet Spy Alger Hiss. Covert operations to subvert the minds of America’s future children were revealed in the Reese committee hearings of 1953 into the great tax-exempt Foundations.
It was discovered that via educational grant giving, the Ford, Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations promoted communism, now called globalism to comfortably merge the United States with the then Soviet Union. What they call it has changed several times, but this communist agenda continues to this day.
In 1982 Norman Dodd, the Director Of Research committee chairman of the Reese Committee gave testimony regarding this link to communist subversion in education funded by the Tax Exempt Foundations. A full interview with Norman Dodd from 1982 on this subject can be viewed below.
„Norman Dodd interview with G. Edward Griffin (1982)
The rest is history. History that leads up this very point in time. In 2015, the slow, Fabian Turtle became the fast, ferocious wolf, devouring the sheep and revealing their evil for all to see.
They went for broke, continuing to pull out all the stops, ever increasing the speed and intensity of implementing the push toward world totalitarian socialism. And as we are as witnessing today, sadly, the enemies of freedom are not only abroad. Many are right here within.
Bertrand RusselleugenicsNew World Ordersocial engineering“

Source:
https://www.howardnema.com/2020/02/19/bertrand-russell-eugenics-socialism-and-the-new-world-order/
///
„See in your mind’s eye a B-29 bomber aircraft, called the „Enola Gay,“ flying to its hellish appointment, that horror-stricken summer’s day in 1945. 4 Why did the United States government drop the only two nuclear-fission weapons in its arsenal upon those two virtually defenseless population-centers in Japan? The U.S. government lied when it said this was necessary to save perhaps a million or so U.S. soldiers‘ lives. Before the dropping of what quickly came to be described in awe-stricken tones as „the bomb,“ the Emperor of Japan was already negotiating surrender with the Truman government, through Vatican channels, on the same terms Japan’s surrender was accepted after the bombs were dropped.5
With that brief reminiscence, we have touched the history of this century at one of its crucial turning-points.
Since the alleged military urgency of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a lie, whose purpose did that bombing serve? One of those whose purpose was served in Hiroshima that day, was a modern Mephistopheles, Bertrand Russell, whose shadow is cast ominously upon both the living and generations of all mankind yet unborn, at the projected 1994 U.N.O. Cairo Population Conference. To understand why British intelligence networks inside the U.S. government manipulated President Harry Truman into dropping those unnecessary atom bombs upon Japanese civilians, it suffices to read Russell’s own explanation of his and Winston Churchill’s nuclear-weapons policy, in the September 1946 edition of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: „The Atomic Bomb and the Prevention of War.“
In that 1946 report, Russell presents his motive for the continued use of the geopolitical threat of nuclear weaponry by himself, Winston Churchill, et al.: to blackmail Moscow into submitting to an agreement whose purpose, Russell states explicitly there, is to transform the then recently established United Nations Organization into the kind of one-world dictatorship for which his world-federalist utopians have continued to work throughout this century.
Russell’s strategic dogma, as articulated in that 1946 edition of The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, has shaped most of the history of this planet since that date. Since Soviet General Secretary N.S. Khrushchev sent four official representatives to Russell in London in 1955, to negotiate a thermonuclear condominium along the lines Russell had prescribed in that 1946 statement of his strategic doctrine,8 until the fall of the Gorbachev government in August 1991, the smaller and weaker nations of the world have been ruled by a U.N.O. world government in the form of a thermonuclear condominium between the political blocs dominated respectively by the two rival super-powers, Moscow and the Anglo-Americans.
For those who know both the approximately fifty-years history of the discovery of nuclear fission and fusion, since the discoveries of both Professor Dmitri Mendeleyev and the Curies,9 the proof exists to show that Russell’s intent as expressed in that 1946 article, was the same intent which Russell and his cronies had in duping the United States government into building the bomb in the first place: to produce and use a weapon so horrifying that nations would surrender their sovereignties to a global arbiter of policy, a United Nations world-government dictatorship, the „final imperialism.“
Excepting a few, such as the Dr. Leo Szilard,10who was approximately as evil as his master Russell, most of the scientists working on the Manhattan Project were, like the Fusion Energy Foundation co-founder, the late Professor Robert J. Moon ,11 dedicated and accomplished persons, who sincerely believed Russell’s great lie of 1939, that Hitler was committed to building a nuclear-fission weapon, and that we must get there first. Russell and his cronies, the true authors of the famous letter to President Franklin Roosevelt which Russell’s cabal induced Albert Einstein to sign,12 knew that Hitler was not going to sponsor such research and that the relevant German scientists around Professor Werner Heisenberg were determined that such a weapon not be built for Hitler’s use.
Unlike the misinformed honest atom scientists, the Russell of 1939 pushed to have the weapon built for exactly the motives he articulated later in the 1946 restatement of his intent. World-federalist, utopian fanatic Russell conceived of the development and use of nuclear weaponry as a trick for terrifying governments into abandoning the right to defend their sovereignties by military means. As he stated this purpose in his 1946 piece, he intended to terrify the peoples of the world into submitting to rule by a global arbiter of conflicts, to a world empire, a global, Malthusian dictatorship of the United Nations Organization.
Britain’s Lord Bertrand Russell has been, beyond any reasonable doubt, the most evil public figure of the passing century. England’s murdered Christopher Marlowe might have said fairly that the Thule Society’s monstrous Adolf Hitler was but a picaresque rogue cast as Dr. Faustus, whereas Russell was a true Mephistopheles. Marlowe would insist upon qualifying his observation: „A truly Venetian Mephistopheles.“
Russell personally did not cause all of the evil which has proliferated throughout our planet during the past hundred-odd years, but he was one of the most influential individuals among those who did. Moreover, if one traces out the influences which caused Russell to become an evil man, one will also come to understand not only what went wrong during the Twentieth Century, but many preceding centuries before that.
The Twentieth Century will go down in future history, as the century which is outstanding for the endless monotony of its popularly believed lies. The myth of Bertrand Russell as an utopian humanitarian, is perhaps among the more widespread such lies which persist as generally accepted among literate people who ought to know better. How is such amazing credulity of presumably literate, educated people possible, even up to the highest ranks in academia and even the intelligence services of the U.S. government, for example? We use the case of Russell here as an example of that problem. Reviewing the highlights of Russell’s multifarious evil provides the setting in which to supply the answer to the question, „Why are today’s putatively literate people so blindly credulous?““
Conspiracy Revelation: 4.1.2021: Good Question, because they do not know enough of history and are only concerned with superficialities….it takes a lot of time and persistence and energized enthusiasm to research and put the pieces of the puzzle together…the average Joe neither has the time nor persistence to dig into the evil that befell Mother Earth…
„The answer to that question is the subject of this report.
1. Russell and Hitler
Russell played many strings on his fiddle of evil. His proposals for genocide, especially against populations with darker skin-hues than that of the Vril Society’s self-esteemed Anglo-Saxon master race, are fully as satanic, and more viciously personalized than his policies of world dictatorship through nuclear terrorism. He was also a savage hoaxster in his corrosive influence within the domains of philosophy and natural science. He was not even truly British; there is not a gram of concern for the well-being of the inhabitants of the United Kingdom in that scoundrel. No notable representative of liberal philosophy during this century, not even such consummately perverse creatures as Sigmund Freud or Theodor Adorno,15 has been so consistently a virtual incarnation of Satan as the Mephistopheles of this century, the evil Russell.
Yet, within each part of the intellectual spectrum which he infested at one time or another of his life, there are still dupes who regard this unmitigated scoundrel as a respectable figure, even a great intellect. How could civilization have fallen so low, that many among the world’s putative intelligentsia exhibit such intellectual or even moral shamelessness as to profess what is termed popularly „respect“ for such a creature?
Consider a handful of crucial passages from Russell’s racialist writings of the pre-war and post-war period; these writings show the true moral nature of the purpose to which Russell dedicated that dogma of nuclear blackmail which he and Leo „Strangelove“ Szilard bestowed upon such worthy apostles as Robert Strange McNamara of the Vietnam „body count“ enterprise16 and upon self-proclaimed British Foreign Office agent Henry A. Kissinger.“
…
„In his 1941 Generalplan Ost for the occupation of Russia and other parts of Eastern Europe, Adolf Hitler put precisely these disgusting policies of Russell’s into practice.22 So, in 1945, we came to identify the consequences of Russell’s empiricist dogmas by such appropriate terms as „genocide,“ „holocaust,“ and „crimes against humanity,“ as practiced in war-time Auschwitz and other locations in Eastern Europe:
In the areas in question we have to push a deliberately negative population policy. With the propaganda campaigns, especially in the press, radio, movies, leaflets, short brochures, educational presentations and the like, the population must be induced toward the thought of how damaging it is to have many children. We must point to the costs which children entail, and then it should be pointed out what could have been bought instead. The great dangers to the health of women which can emerge in births can be pointed out, and the like.
In addition to this propaganda, generous propaganda in favor of means of birth control must be spread. An industry specialized in such means has to be created. Neither the approval or dissemination of birth control means should be punishable, nor abortion. We ought to absolutely promote the establishment of abortion institutes. Midwives and medics can be trained to give abortions. The more professionally the abortions are carried out, the more the population will gain trust in this respect. Also physicians must of course be permitted to carry out abortions, without a violation of his medical oath coming into question.
Voluntary sterilization is also to be promoted. Infant mortality must not be combatted. Mothers must not be instructed about care for infants and children’s diseases. …
Once we have converted the mass of the people to the idea of a one- or two-child system, we will have reached the goal we are aiming at … .23
On the basis of such evidence, the sole grounds on which we might be prohibited from describing as „neo-Nazis“ Russell and such among his liberal U.S. co-thinkers as the Harriman and Bush families‘ eugenics circles of 1932, is that the ideas Adolf Hitler copied were those of his British and U.S. admirers of the 1930’s, such as Sir Peregrine Worsthorne’s stepfather, Montagu Norman, George Bush’s father, Prescott Bush, and those other professed non-German admirers of Adolf Hitler who authorized and funded the coup d’état which put Hitler into power in Germany in 1933.24 It would be appropriate to describe Adolf Hitler as an exemplary follower of Bertrand Russell.
Even the post-war exposure of the horrors of the Nazi concentration camps did not hinder Russell’s continued brazen exhibitions of shamelessness. Read some gems from his post-war writings, his 1951 The Impact of Science on Society:“
„SCHILLER INSTITUTE
How Bertrand Russell
Became An Evil Man
by
Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
July 28, 1994“
Source: https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/943a_russell_lhl.html