SHADOW-BANNED Interview – Dr Katherine Horton – What They Don't Want You To Know

1 Antwort zu SHADOW-BANNED Interview – Dr Katherine Horton – What They Don't Want You To Know

1. snoop4truth sagt:

   3. März 2019 um 22:24

   http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
   THE FAKE PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRE HOAX):
   More Deborah Tavares hoaxes here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105568-The-Hoaxes-of-Deborah-Tavares
   VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb–FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)
   In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent forest fires in California by beaming energy beams from satellites in space at California forests. But, her claims about these emails are false. They are FORGERIES.
   Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”) is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.
   But, PG&E’s conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for it customers to use.
   WHAT PG&E HAS SAID ABOUT THIS IDEA SINCE 2009:
   https://www.pge.com/en_US/small-medi…se_link-energy
   Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with this finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.
   THE CONTRACT IS DISCRIBED HERE:
   http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n…/#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at paragraphs 1-5)
   https://www.afcea.org/content/space-…closer-reality(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)
   https://www.scientificamerican.com/a…-light-of-day/(at the final two paragraphs)
   https://www.businessinsider.com/spac…r-earth-2014-7(at the final two paragraphs)
   Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and opposes PG&E “smart meters”. So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, the scientific and economic literature and PG&E’s own documents indicated that this technology did not yet exist.
   CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
   This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here. https://www.businessinsider.com/spac…r-earth-2014-7
   This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
   https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR…olar-Power.pdf
   This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new…ospaceforpower.
   This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here. http://earthsky.org/earth/space-base…ser-to-reality
   This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62 http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/…e_12-14-16.pdf
   This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph. http://www.alternative-energy-news.i…ls-into-orbit/
   SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
   THE FORGERIES:
   1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES: http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2…rn-california/
   Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
   2. TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/
   3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)
   Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE “PROOF” that PG&E used this future beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.
   THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
   1. Tavares did not know what “space weather” actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). “Solar flares” on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called “space weather” (like a “rain” or “storm” OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth’s atmosphere that protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such “space weather” is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why “space weather” would be of such concern to PG&E. During “damaging space weather”, PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.
   DEBORAH TAVARES’ MISTAKE:
   But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that “space weather” was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).
   HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
   In FORGING the phrase “…then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]” in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that “damaging space weather” is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from “damaging space weather” is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that customers can NEVER be “blamed” for the “consequences” of “damaging space weather”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
   2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E’s contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, all PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this.
   HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
   In FORGING the sentence, “WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol” in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually “targeted” her with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E “smart meters”. See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!
   Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E had no ability to aim Solaren’s energy beams or to move Solaren’s receptor station from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
   Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren’s actual receptor site is in Fresno (hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert) and that PG&E has no say in where such a Solaren receptor site goes. Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it visible to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).
   PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:
   http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34239347/n…/#.XHRAB1KFPIU (at the 3rd paragraph)
   https://www.scientificamerican.com/a…-light-of-day/ (at end of 2nd paragraph)
   https://www.electricityforum.com/new…ospaceforpower (at the 16th paragraph)
   Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren’s receptor site as “OUR” receptor site, would know that Solaren’s receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren’s receptor site. The foregoing mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.
   3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a “reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren’s technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E’s use of Solaren’s technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer’s money in the project. The CPUC did not need a “reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren’s technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This “reminder” serves NO PURPOSE.
   4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E’s customers as “EARTHLINGS” in connection with an email about a “COVER UP” of “damaging space weather” which can cause nothing power outages?
   5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS “AKA EARTHLINGS” FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF “DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS. This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
   THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
   1. The sentence, “You as a California resident have every right to know what your “public utilities” are doing with their (sic) “RATE DOLLARS”, was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no “rate dollars” from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren’s technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren’s technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
   2. The term, “EARTH, INC.” in “comment ONE:” a “signature” term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…iz.42h9ExblMs8
   3. The phrase, “very disturbing” in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah Tavares phrase. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.ld2pLLtGq-c
   4. The term, “FOIA”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.MsKCoGqM1QE
   5. The term, “iceberg”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.brv_lDgjd1o
   6. The term, “footprints”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…71.6jJyS4QOIyw
   7. The term, “assessment”, in “comment TWO:” is a “signature” Deborah Tavares term. https://www.google.com/search?biw=13…iz.VQSLXAWgla8
   8. BOTH “comment ONE:” and “comment TWO:” contain hyphenated terms (” – “), a writing custom rare in today’s world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.
   PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!
   ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
   Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares’ role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.
   The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a “good reason” to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

   Antworten

Schreibe einen Kommentar Antworten abbrechen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Kommentar *

Name *

E-Mail *

Website

Meinen Namen, meine E-Mail-Adresse und meine Website in diesem Browser speichern, bis ich wieder kommentiere.

Captcha *

Geben Sie den obigen Text ein:

Current yeignore me@r*

Leave this field empty